Peer Review Process

The author submits the manuscript via the Journal of Educational Science Learning and Research page.
The editor checks the manuscript with Plagiarism Checker software to check for possible plagiarism.
The results of the plagiarism check are used to determine whether the manuscript is ACCEPTED or REJECTED.
The editor submits the manuscript to the reviewer for double blind review.
Reviewers submit the results of their reviews to the editor to be forwarded to the author.
The author corrects the manuscript according to the reviewer's notes and suggestions and returns the manuscript to the editor through the Journal of Educational Science Learning and Research.
The Copy Editor checks the manuscript for compliance with the editorial board's policies.
The proofreader checks the manuscript for conformity with PUEBI (General Guidelines for English Spelling).
The Layout Editor checks the manuscript for compliance with the template and circuit rules.
Journal managers are ready to publish manuscripts according to the publication period.

Double Blind Peer Review is a method of peer review of a scientific work that will be published in a scientific periodical, in which the identities of the reviewer and author are hidden, so that the reviewer does not know whose article is being reviewed and its author. also don't know who reviewed the article. This method is used to maintain the objectivity of the review results.

The length of the review process is 3 to. 8 weeks. Authors are asked to actively monitor the progress of manuscript reviews through the Journal of Educational Science Learning and Research and be willing to follow the applicable process.