Posting article policy

the overall quality of the manuscript and the accuracy and precision of its details. When evaluating manuscripts for Journal Of Educational Science Learning And Research, pay attention to the following aspects:

  • SCOPE. Is the manuscript within the scope of the Journal Of Educational Science Learning And Research? How interesting is the article to journal readers?
  • RESEARCH NEWEST. Is the article new and interesting enough? Does it add new knowledge? How original is the research?
  • SUITABILITY OF THE TITLE. Does the title accurately represent the content?
  • QUALITY OF CONTENT. Does the article comply with the standards of the Journal of Educational Science Learning and Research? Is the research question important? Does the manuscript help to expand or advance current research in its respective field?
  • METHODOLOGY. Is the methodology description informative, clear, and concise? Was the research methodology appropriate and carried out correctly? How appropriate the experimental approach or design is
  • SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS. Do the results have significant implications for educational science studies?
  • SUITABILITY OF TABLES, FIGURES, AND/OR ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. Is every figure/table necessary and explained correctly? Does the additional material match the content?
  • DATA COMPLETENESS. How complete is the data?
  • RELEVANCE OF THE DISCUSSION. Is the discussion relevant to the results and other content? Have the authors appropriately discussed their results in the context of previous research?
  • SUITABILITY OF CITATION/REFERENCE. Do all quotes count? Is there an appropriate number of citations for the content (neither too few nor too many)?
  • CLARITY OF CONTENT. How good is his English? Will readers of Ar Rehla have difficulty understanding its contents?
  • COMPLIANCE WITH GUIDELINES Journal Of Educational Science Learning And Research. Does the manuscript comply with journal guidelines, such as manuscript structure? Have tables and figures been submitted separately?
  • COMPLIANCE WITH CORRECT SCIENTIFIC NOMENCLATURE. Are species names up to date and spelled correctly? Are technical terms used correctly?

Ethical Considerations

In addition to the criteria above, also pay attention to whether the manuscript contains examples of plagiarism, inappropriate references, republication, or fraud. Things to look for:

  • PLAGIARISM. Observe whether parts of the text have been copied from other works without giving proper credit. For example, the text has been copied verbatim without clear indication that it is a quotation, the text has been copied but not quoted (indicating that these are the author's own words/ideas), or a portion of the text has been copied without permission from the original author. If you find that a large portion of the manuscript has been plagiarized, please contact the editor as soon as possible so that we can take appropriate action.
  • MISSING, WRONG, OR INCOMPLETE REFERENCES. All previously published text, figures, tables, data, ideas, or concepts must be cited. It is considered plagiarism for an author to present something as their own even though it is not, regardless of their intentions.
  • REPUBLICATION. It is against Ar Rehla policy to publish work that has been published elsewhere. Please notify the editor if you find examples of manuscripts that have been previously published (in whole or in part).
  • FRAUD. Any part of the manuscript found to be incorrect should be highlighted as such. Any form of data manipulation or tampering should be brought to the editor's attention.

Publication ethics are not limited to these four things. If you believe the author has attempted to mislead readers, violate a copyright or patent, or may compromise the integrity of the journal in any other way, please contact the handling editor.