COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING AND DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
Abstract
Environmental law enforcement is one of the most crucial instruments in global ecosystem protection, yet its implementation reveals a highly significant gap between developing and developed countries. This study aims to comparatively analyze the effectiveness of environmental law enforcement systems in both groups of countries, focusing on four key dimensions: the effectiveness of environmental regulations, the institutional capacity of enforcement agencies, the application of sanctions for violations, and the level of public participation and environmental awareness. The approach employed is normative juridical and comparative, with case study analyses from representative countries including Indonesia, India, and Brazil as developing countries, and Germany, the United States, and Sweden as developed countries. Data were collected through an in-depth literature review of legislation, reports from international institutions such as UNEP, the World Bank, and the OECD, as well as academic research published between 2020 and 2025. The findings indicate that developed countries hold a substantially comparative advantage in terms of comprehensive regulatory frameworks, the technical and financial capacity of enforcement agencies, and firm sanction mechanisms that can be consistently implemented. Conversely, developing countries face layered challenges encompassing regulatory fragmentation, limited enforcement agency resources, structural corruption, and low legal awareness among the public. Nevertheless, this study also identifies a number of policy innovations and best practices from developing countries that are worthy of global adaptation. The study concludes that the effectiveness of environmental law enforcement is not solely determined by a country's economic wealth, but rather by political commitment, institutional governance, and the active participation of civil society.
References
Boyle, A., & Harrison, J. (2023). Environmental law and international governance: Compliance mechanisms and domestic enforcement. Journal of Environmental Law, 35(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqac017
Faure, M. G., & Partain, R. A. (2019). Environmental law and economics: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108558808
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Gunningham, N. (2020). Environmental law, regulation and governance: Shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental Law, 32(3), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqaa027
Hochstetler, K. (2022). Political economies of energy transition: Wind and solar power in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009000864
OECD. (2023). Environmental enforcement: Assessing country performance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264308817-en
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
Rajamani, L., & Ghosh, S. (2021). Environmental law in India: New judicial interventions and institutional dynamics. Asian Journal of International Law, 11(2), 295–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251321000011
Rechtschaffen, C., Gauna, E., & O’Neill, C. A. (2021). Environmental justice: Law, policy and regulation (3rd ed.). Carolina Academic Press. https://cap-press.com/books/isbn/9781531018528
Suharto, D. G., & Maulana, I. (2022). Efektivitas penegakan hukum lingkungan di Indonesia pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol52.no1.3281
Susilowati, I., Prabowo, A. H., & Wijayanti, R. (2023). Comparative institutional capacity for environmental law enforcement: Indonesia and Germany. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 4(1), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.19184/ijls.v4i1.37654
